Meg McLain on the Alex Jones Show

If you are flying to non-us destinations, travel to Canada or Mexico and fly from there. Canada is starting to use the porn-o-scanners, but if you opt out, they don’t sexually assault you.

If you are planning holidays abroad, drive to Canada or Mexico and fly from there to your destination. Travel only to places that don’t use the porn-o-scanners. Italy is banning the scanners, other European countries will soon follow their lead. Spend your holiday dollars in Italy, vote with your wallet. Do not fly or do business with with any US airline until they ban the scanners. If you can’t travel other than by using US airports, consider using videoconferencing (buy a webcam and use Skype). This will let you visit with friends and family without having to subject yourself to the degradation of the TSA.

Great interview, Meg!

Is it possible to make airlines disclaim that purchasing a ticket may–”Among other symptoms, you may be subject nude photography, full body searches, being touched in private places, and temporarily restrained from your property if you attempt to use this product or resist symptoms”–?

If Pharm and Credit has to disclaim, why not Airlines? Hey, Jersey is putting defunct lungs on cigarette packages. Should airlines tickets have pictures from Back Ray Scanners?

Mark
Mark

The following is a Letter to the Editor which I sent to WorldNetDaily. Wanted to share it here, since I feel it is relevant:

To the Editor ~

Upon reading the recent first article which told of a pilot’s humiliating treatment when he refused the TSA’s full body scan, I could see immediately two ulterior motives on behalf of the feds. Both of which make this a win/win situation for them, regardless of how the American people choose to respond to the TSA’s invasive, voyeuristic tactics.
1) These new invasive searches which the gov’t claims the right to do in the name of public safety — whether the full body scan or the “enhanced pat-down” which probes and pokes even the most personal of cavities and anatomy — are giving the federal gov’t an invaluable insight or a “take” on just how willing the American public is to have their Constitutional rights to privacy or unreasonable search violated in the name of “safety”, or for the mere convenience (read, “privilege”) of flying vs. driving. Moreover, it is revealing to the feds just how much the people will tolerate such personally violating Gestapo-like tactics, even as more and more branches of our local law enforcement entities continue to be federalized. And it is but one more tactic on behalf of the feds to subtly condition the minds of Americans to comply with this kind of gov’t invasion or violation (whether bodily or in reference to our Constitutional rights) as a necessary evil that must be accepted in the name of “safety”. And,
2) If there truly is an uprising of enough Americans who refuse to comply with these sexually invasive scans or pat-downs, and who consequently refuse to fly, then the TSA (read, federal gov’t) will in time succeed in bankrupting the entire airline industry, thus giving the federal gov’t the opportunity to then nationalize the airlines through some bailout scheme. In short, the government’s feigned concern for our “safety” will, once again, become the means to accomplishing their agenda of further socializing our nation.
In light of this, it becomes critically important that all those who refuse to fly as a result of the gov’t intrusion make their reasons known to a number of their favorite airlines, and encourage them to lobby on behalf or their now disenchanted former customers to bring the TSA and the feds back to sanity or accountability under Constitutional law. If we don’t tell the airlines WHY we’re not flying, or let them know that we are eager to return as customers once this invasive practice has been removed from our airports, then we are only helping to bring them to bankruptcy without giving them any reason for the sudden drop in revenue. And again, this becomes a BIG WIN for the Obama socialist machine if it ultimately gives them the opportunity to nationalize the ailing airline industry. Hence, we must get the airlines themselves – or the airline industry as a whole – involved in having this degrading federal perversion stopped at our airports. It should be a symbiotic relationship — we provide the airlines with sales and revenue, but ONLY if they can provide us with a safe flight that does not require that we allow ourselves to be assaulted or sexually violated.

We must NOT let the federal gov’t win this one! There is way too much at stake: 1) our personal and Constitutional rights to privacy as well as against unreasonable searches, and 2) our entire commercial airline industry.

I would encourage all Americans to resist. But let the airlines know that you want their help in stopping this perversion!!

~ Eric Embertson