According to Ken Wooden, founder of Child Lures Prevention and expert in the fight against child sexual abuse, TSA pat downs make kids more susceptible to child sexual predators. As a parent, even if I thought the scanners were safe for my son, he still might get patted down after coming out of the scanner. This is a lose-lose for parents.

Raw Story reports:

An expert in the fight against child sexual abuse is raising the alarm about a technique the TSA is reportedly using to get children to co-operate with airport pat-downs: calling it a “game”.

Ken Wooden, founder of Child Lures Prevention, says the TSA’s recommendation that children be told the pat-down is a “game” is potentially putting children in danger.

Telling a child that they are engaging in a game is “one of the most common ways” that sexual predators use to convince children to engage in inappropriate contact, Wooden told Raw Story.

Children “don’t have the sophistication” to distinguish between a pat-down carried out by an airport security officer and an assault by a sexual predator, he said.

The TSA policy could “desensitize children to inappropriate touch and ultimately make it easier for sexual offenders to prey on our children,” Wooden added.

Following an outcry last month over the use on children of “enhanced pat-downs” — which involve the touching of genitals — the TSA announced a new “modified” pat-down for children under 12. However, as the LA Times noted, the new rules are “unclear” on whether TSA agents can touch children’s genitals.

Addressing the controversy over pat-downs of children last month, TSA regional security director James Marchand told the press the TSA was working on new practices to make children more comfortable during the pat-down process.

“You try to make it as best you can for that child to come through. If you can come up with some kind of a game to play with a child, it makes it a lot easier,” said Marchand, promising to make it part of TSA training.

Continue Reading

Here’s more on the “grooming” process child sexual predators use. Note, no one is saying the TSA are child sexual predators. The point is that by making the pat downs a game, the TSA is rendering kids more susceptible to child sexual predators.

Grooming is a process of desensitization that predators use on children to prepare and trick them into accepting sexual abuse. Once the predator has gained the child’s trust and confidence, they use everyday behaviours, like telling an inappropriate joke, a touch on the upper arm that lingers a little too long or a kiss on the lips to test whether your child is likely to tell on them. If the perpetrator is satisfied that your child won’t tell, the predator moves onto other forms of bad touching. If the child still doesn’t tell, then the abuse continues along the continuum of abuse from non contact, to contact and often ending with penetration and sometimes even homicide.

Email This Post

7 Responses to TSA Pat Downs Pave the Way for Child Sexual Predators

  1. Cheryl says:

    Thank you for your enlightenment of the general population. I was a victim of child molestation and I can tell you that my experience at the hands of TSA was devastating to say the least.

    I most appreciate your telling people how sexual predators “work” on the minds of the young.

    TSA making a “game” of the pat downs is exactly what you say “conditioning” that will leave our children vulnerable.

    Thanks again for your efforts,

    Cheryl

  2. mike says:

    “Note, no one is saying the TSA are child sexual predators.”

    Ummm…*I* am! Maybe an individual TSA agent – or even most TSA gate agents – isn’t a child sexual predator, but the agency as a whole is. Institutionalized molestation is *evil* and the tactics they are using to “justify” it are, as this article states, straight out of a sexual predator’s methodology. “If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck and waddles like a duck…”

  3. Rob says:

    Let’s see, they use coercion and threats to obtain “permission” to touch your genitals and secondary sexual organs. Sounds like a sexual predator to me.

  4. Ken says:

    Yep. They’re sexual predators, no doubt about it. The ONLY thing that distinguishes them from any other sexual predator is that they are government employees, but if some guy who does office work for the Social Security administration, or a police officer, or a worker on a road crew, molests your child, they’re still molesting your child. Being a government employee doesn’t give them a license to do it. Neither does having fanatically bizarre beliefs and fears about ‘terrorism’ that aren’t supported by the data and aren’t shared by either the general public or by genuine experts in the field like the Israeli official quoted here and here.

  5. THIS …… was the main reason I objected to my family flying ever again. I do not want my children conditioned to allow molestation by someone wearing “some sort of official looking uniform.” Any freak on the street can go to a uniform supply store and get clothing that looks remarkably similar to a generic “security officer.”

    No way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments must be polite. NO personal attacks. Keep the debate lively but respectful. Comments that violate this rule will be deleted. Overly repetitive comments will also not be published. (Individuals like us are not limited by the first amendment.)

Recent Comments

  • Linnae: Being told to do the wrong thing and then doing it still makes you liable. I hold TSA employees just as...
  • Christian Dignity: @Jason Robinson-Do some research on Kay Griggs. Not the my space site. There are 8 hrs of live...
  • Jim Babb: That is the nature of government. It can’t act without violating someones rights. It’s very...

Topics